Skip to content
Singulariki

Non-Destructive Testing Specialists

Occupation · SOC 17-3029.01

Test the safety of structures, vehicles, or vessels using x-ray, ultrasound, fiber optic or related equipment.

Also called: NDE Technician (Non-Destructive Evaluation Technician) · NDT Specialist (Non-Destructive Testing Specialist) · NDT Technical Specialist (Non-Destructive Testing Technical Specialist) · NDT Technician (Non-Destructive Testing Technician) · Industrial Radiographer · NDT Coordinator (Non-Destructive Testing Coordinator) · NDT Inspector (Non-Destructing Testing Inspector) · Certified Welding Inspector (CWI) · Corrosion Control Technician (Corrosion Control Tech) · Corrosion Technician (Corrosion Tech) · NDE Specialist (Non-Destructive Evaluation Specialist) · NDI Technician (Non-Destructive Inspection Technician)

Job family: Architecture and Engineering Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-17-3029-01/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Document non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, processes, or results. · 0.4%
See how AI is used here →

Use as a copilot

Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.

  • Prepare reports on non-destructive testing (NDT) results. · 0.4%
See collaboration patterns →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Prepare reports on non-destructive testing (NDT) results. · 89.5% need a human
  • Document non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, processes, or results. · 87.2% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

56th-percentile task overlap — yet about 5,700 openings a year (+1.5% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 2078% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Moderate 53rd 0.2
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate 48th 0.6
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High 69th 0.2

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.0), with simple added tooling (β 0.3), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.6). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.2 · 36th percentile among occupations · Moderate

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Evaluate material properties, using radio astronomy, voltage and amperage measurement, or rheometric flow measurement. 0.9%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +1.5% by 2034
Projected annual openings 5,700
Employment 2024 → 2034 67,300 → 68,300

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international 4 occupations below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

28% mean task exposure (2025)
52nd percentile of 427 placed occupations
−6 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Chemical Engineering Technicians · 3116 32% Not exposed
Mining and metallurgical technicians · 3117 28% Not exposed
Mechanical Engineering Technicians · 3115 26% Not exposed
Physical and Engineering Science Technicians Not Elsewhere Classified · 3119 26% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 20.8% working with AI · 39.0% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 3.5 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 58.4%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Document non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, processes, or results. Directive 0.4%
Prepare reports on non-destructive testing (NDT) results. Iteration 0.4%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Prepare reports on non-destructive testing (NDT) results. 89.5%
Document non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, processes, or results. 87.2%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me document non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, processes, or results.

    From: Document non-destructive testing (NDT) methods, processes, or results. · 0.4% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me prepare reports on non-destructive testing (NDT) results.

    From: Prepare reports on non-destructive testing (NDT) results. · 0.4% of measured AI use · task iteration

Tasks

All 16 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Emerging tasks

Newer responsibilities O*NET has flagged as growing for this occupation.

  • Operate drones for remote inspection of large or hard-to-reach structures, such as wind turbines, bridges, or tall buildings.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Abilities

Problem Sensitivity 4.1
Written Comprehension 4.0
Deductive Reasoning 4.0
Near Vision 4.0
Oral Comprehension 3.8
Inductive Reasoning 3.8
Information Ordering 3.8
Oral Expression 3.6
Far Vision 3.6
Written Expression 3.5
Flexibility of Closure 3.3
Speech Recognition 3.3
Speech Clarity 3.3

Knowledge

Engineering and Technology 4.1
Mathematics 4.0
English Language 3.9
Physics 3.8
Education and Training 3.7
Computers and Electronics 3.7
Customer and Personal Service 3.4
Production and Processing 3.4
Mechanical 3.3
Administration and Management 3.2
Public Safety and Security 3.2
Design 3.1
Building and Construction 3.1

Essential skills

Reading Comprehension 3.9
Active Listening 3.6
Critical Thinking 3.5
Monitoring 3.4
Writing 3.3
Active Learning 3.3
Speaking 3.1
Mathematics 3.1
Learning Strategies 3.1

Transferable skills

Quality Control Analysis 3.9
Operations Monitoring 3.3
Complex Problem Solving 3.1
Operation and Control 3.1
Judgment and Decision Making 3.1

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology In demand
Autodesk AutoCAD Computer aided design CAD software Hot technology
Microsoft Access Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology
Microsoft Project Project management software Hot technology
SAP software Enterprise resource planning ERP software Hot technology
Dassault Systemes CATIA Computer aided design CAD software
Fractal Concept SoftScan Analytical or scientific software
GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies Rhythm UT Analytical or scientific software
Geographic information system GIS systems Geographic information system
IBM Notes Electronic mail software
National Instruments DAQ Assistant Analytical or scientific software
National Instruments LabVIEW Development environment software
National Instruments NI Motion Assistant Computer aided manufacturing CAM software
National Instruments NI Vision Builder for Automated Inspection AI Analytical or scientific software
Visualization Sciences Group VSG Avizo Fire Analytical or scientific software
Visualization Sciences Group VSG Open Inventor Graphics or photo imaging software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.7
E-Mail 4.6
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 4.6
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.5
Telephone Conversations 4.4
Time Pressure 4.3
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 4.2
Frequency of Decision Making 4.1
Freedom to Make Decisions 4.1
Health and Safety of Other Workers 4.0
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 4.0
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 4.0
Contact With Others 4.0
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 4.0
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 3.9
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 3.9
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 3.9
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 3.9
Outdoors, Under Cover 3.8
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.7
Consequence of Error 3.7
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.6
Written Letters and Memos 3.6
Wear Specialized Protective or Safety Equipment such as Breathing Apparatus, Safety Harness, Full Protection Suits, or Radiation Protection 3.5
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.5
Physical Proximity 3.5
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 3.5
Level of Competition 3.5
Exposed to Radiation 3.4
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 3.4
Exposed to High Places 3.3
Exposed to Contaminants 3.3
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 3.3
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 3.2
Exposed to Hazardous Equipment 3.2
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 3.1
Exposed to Hazardous Conditions 3.1
Spend Time Standing 3.1
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 3.0
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 2.9

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
Associate's degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Engineering/Engineering-Related Technologies/Technicians , Military Technologies and Applied Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

High School Diploma 68.2%
Some College Courses 9.1%
Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 9.1%
Post-Secondary Certificate 4.5%
Bachelor's Degree 4.5%
Post-Baccalaureate Certificate 4.5%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Realistic 6.4
Investigative 5.0
Conventional 4.6

Interest areas

Engineering 5.8
Mechanics/Electronics 5.1
Physical Science 4.1
Mathematics/Statistics 2.9
Physical/Manual Labor 2.6
Information Technology 2.3
Transportation/Machine Operation 2.0
Construction/Woodwork 1.9

Work styles

Dependability 4.0
Attention to Detail 3.0
Cautiousness 2.6
Integrity 2.3
Achievement Orientation 1.7

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$47k10th$60k25th$77kMedian$98k75th$115k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
67k202468k2034 (proj.)+1.5% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $47,010
25th percentile $59,700
Median (50th) $77,390
75th percentile $97,760
90th percentile $114,630
People employed 64,410

Wages and employment are reported by BLS for the broader occupation group this specialty belongs to (SOC 17-3029), not for the specialty alone.

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 19,500 $70,520
Manufacturing · Sector 17,150 $68,010
Engineering Services · National industry 4,810 $65,790
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 4,580 $63,340
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 1,460 $66,920
Educational Services · Sector 1,380 $63,000
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 1,360 $77,840
Temporary Help Services · National industry 1,040 $65,360
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 1,030 $83,620
Wholesale Trade · Sector 950 $66,870
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction · Sector 750 $86,450
Utilities · Sector 730 $100,100

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry 64.34× 4,580
Engineering Services · National industry 9.96× 4,810
Nuclear Electric Power Generation · National industry 6.45× 100
Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · National industry 4.37× 130
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 4.33× 19,500
Manufacturing · Sector 3.22× 17,150
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction · Sector 3.13× 750
Utilities · Sector 3.02× 730

Part of the Advanced Manufacturing , Arts, Entertainment, & Design , Construction , Energy & Natural Resources , Public Service & Safety and Supply Chain & Transportation career clusters.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Non-Destructive Testing Specialists sits at the 56th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 66th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Non-Destructive Testing Specialists Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and Weighers Nuclear Monitoring Technicians Robotics Technicians Chemical Technicians Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologists and Technicians Calibration Technologists and Technicians AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Non-Destructive Testing Specialists — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Non-Destructive Testing Specialists show 56th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 5,700 annual U.S. openings

  • Non-Destructive Testing Specialists rank in the 56th percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 5,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+1.5%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $77,390, across about 64,410 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 21% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Non-Destructive Testing Specialists show 56th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 5,700 annual U.S. openings

• Non-Destructive Testing Specialists rank in the 56th percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 5,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+1.5%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $77,390, across about 64,410 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 21% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Non-Destructive Testing Specialists". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-01
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Non-Destructive Testing Specialists." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-01

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Non-Destructive Testing Specialists. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-01

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-17-3029-01,
  title  = {Non-Destructive Testing Specialists},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-17-3029-01}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.