Occupation · SOC 29-2056.00
Perform medical tests in a laboratory environment for use in the treatment and diagnosis of diseases in animals. Prepare vaccines and serums for prevention of diseases. Prepare tissue samples, take blood samples, and execute laboratory tests, such as urinalysis and blood counts. Clean and sterilize instruments and materials and maintain equipment and machines. May assist a veterinarian during surgery.
Also called: Certified Veterinary Technician (CVT) · Licensed Veterinary Technician (LVT) · Registered Veterinary Technician (RVT) · Veterinary Technician (Vet Tech) · Emergency Veterinary Technician (Emergency Vet Tech) · Internal Medicine Veterinary Technician (Internal Medicine Vet Tech) · Veterinarian Technician (Vet Tech) · Veterinary Laboratory Technician (Vet Lab Tech) · Veterinary Nurse (Vet Nurse) · Veterinary Technologist · Animal Care Technician (Animal Care Tech) · Animal Health Technician (Animal Health Tech)
Job family: Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations
A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch
/roles/role-29-2056-00/context.md directly.
A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.
Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.
Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.
The capabilities O*NET rates most important for this occupation — the human ground the work is built on.
See all skills →Independent published positions, read together — not a forecast.
26th-percentile task overlap — yet about 14,300 openings a year (+9.1% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 5000% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →
What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.
Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.
| Measure | Rank vs all occupations | Percentile | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Moderate | 38th | -0.4 | |
| LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Low | 29th | 0.3 | |
| AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Low | 18th | 0.1 |
OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.2), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.3). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.
This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.
A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.
Frey–Osborne probability 0.0 · 18th percentile among occupations · Low
Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.
| Provide information or counseling regarding issues such as animal health care, behavior problems, or nutrition. | 0.5% | |
| Maintain controlled drug inventory and related log books. | 0.3% |
Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.
| Outlook | Growing fast · +9.1% by 2034 |
| Projected annual openings | 14,300 |
| Employment 2024 → 2034 | 134,200 → 146,400 |
“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.
The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.
| International occupation (ISCO-08) | Task exposure (2025) | Most tasks fall in |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Technicians and Assistants · 3240 | 14% | Not exposed |
Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.
How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.
| Augmentation vs. automation | 50.0% working with AI · 18.3% handed to AI |
| Most common way people use AI here | Learning · you ask AI to explain or teach |
| Typical AI autonomy | 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently |
The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.
| Task | How | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Provide information or counseling regarding issues such as animal health care, behavior problems, or nutrition. | Learning | 0.8% |
Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.
| Provide information or counseling regarding issues such as animal health care, behavior problems, or nutrition. | 98.8% |
Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.
Help me provide information or counseling regarding issues such as animal health care, behavior problems, or nutrition. From: Provide information or counseling regarding issues such as animal health care, behavior problems, or nutrition. · 0.8% of measured AI use · learning
All 31 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.
O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4.1 | |
| Customer and Personal Service | 4.1 | |
| Biology | 4.0 | |
| English Language | 4.0 | |
| Mathematics | 3.5 | |
| Chemistry | 3.3 |
| Oral Expression | 3.9 | |
| Deductive Reasoning | 3.9 | |
| Inductive Reasoning | 3.9 | |
| Near Vision | 3.9 | |
| Oral Comprehension | 3.8 | |
| Written Comprehension | 3.8 | |
| Problem Sensitivity | 3.8 | |
| Information Ordering | 3.8 | |
| Speech Recognition | 3.8 | |
| Speech Clarity | 3.4 | |
| Written Expression | 3.1 | |
| Category Flexibility | 3.1 | |
| Flexibility of Closure | 3.1 | |
| Selective Attention | 3.1 | |
| Arm-Hand Steadiness | 3.1 | |
| Manual Dexterity | 3.1 | |
| Finger Dexterity | 3.1 | |
| Perceptual Speed | 3.0 | |
| Trunk Strength | 3.0 | |
| Auditory Attention | 3.0 |
| Active Listening | 3.8 | |
| Critical Thinking | 3.8 | |
| Reading Comprehension | 3.6 | |
| Speaking | 3.6 | |
| Writing | 3.3 | |
| Monitoring | 3.3 | |
| Active Learning | 3.1 | |
| Learning Strategies | 3.0 |
| Complex Problem Solving | 3.3 | |
| Social Perceptiveness | 3.1 | |
| Coordination | 3.1 | |
| Service Orientation | 3.1 | |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 3.1 | |
| Time Management | 3.0 |
Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.
| Example | Category | |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Access | Data base user interface and query software | Hot technology |
| Microsoft Excel | Spreadsheet software | Hot technology |
| Microsoft Office software | Office suite software | Hot technology |
| Microsoft Outlook | Electronic mail software | Hot technology |
| Microsoft PowerPoint | Presentation software | Hot technology |
| Microsoft Word | Word processing software | Hot technology |
| Animal Intelligence Software Animal Intelligence | Medical software | |
| FileMaker Pro | Data base user interface and query software | |
| McAllister Software Systems AVImark | Medical software | |
| Practice management software PMS | Data base user interface and query software | |
| Veterinary practice management software PMS | Medical software | |
| Web browser software | Internet browser software |
How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.
What to study: Agriculture, Agriculture Operations, and Related Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.
Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.
| High School Diploma | 41.3% | |
| Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) | 26.4% | |
| Post-Secondary Certificate | 14.6% | |
| Some College Courses | 7.4% | |
| Doctoral Degree | 5.5% | |
| Bachelor's Degree | 4.9% |
The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.
| Dependability | 7.0 | |
| Attention to Detail | 6.0 | |
| Integrity | 5.0 | |
| Cautiousness | 4.0 | |
| Cooperation | 3.0 | |
| Stress Tolerance | 2.3 |
| Realistic | 6.7 | |
| Investigative | 5.3 | |
| Conventional | 4.6 | |
| Social | 3.0 |
| Animal Service | 6.1 | |
| Health Care Service | 6.0 | |
| Life Science | 5.4 | |
| Medical Science | 4.7 | |
| Physical/Manual Labor | 3.0 | |
| Mathematics/Statistics | 2.3 |
U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)
| 10th percentile | $32,120 |
| 25th percentile | $37,390 |
| Median (50th) | $45,980 |
| 75th percentile | $50,960 |
| 90th percentile | $60,880 |
| People employed | 131,320 |
Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.
| Industry | Workers | National median pay |
|---|---|---|
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector | 120,950 | $45,780 |
| Veterinary Services · National industry | 119,830 | $45,740 |
| Educational Services · Sector | 4,050 | $51,250 |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector | 3,610 | $41,730 |
| Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector | 270 | $55,030 |
| Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector | 260 | $47,780 |
| Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting · Sector | 220 | $45,880 |
| Retail Trade · Sector | 190 | $54,080 |
| Manufacturing · Sector | 180 | $74,810 |
| Wholesale Trade · Sector | 40 | $59,010 |
Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).
| Industry | Concentration | Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Services · National industry | 303.37× | 119,830 |
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector | 13.19× | 120,950 |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector | 0.96× | 3,610 |
| Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting · Sector | 0.61× | 220 |
| Educational Services · Sector | 0.35× | 4,050 |
| Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector | 0.12× | 270 |
| Manufacturing · Sector | 0.02× | 180 |
| Retail Trade · Sector | 0.01× | 190 |
Part of the Agriculture and Healthcare & Human Services career clusters.
Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.
Options the data surfaces for Veterinary Technologists and Technicians — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.
Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.
Occupations O*NET rates as related — the nearby moves on the map.
How people typically prepare for this work.
On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 15th percentile of 427 international occupations.
Veterinary Technologists and Technicians show 26th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 14,300 annual U.S. openings
Veterinary Technologists and Technicians show 26th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 14,300 annual U.S. openings • Veterinary Technologists and Technicians rank in the 26th percentile (Low band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE) • The occupation is projected to see about 14,300 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • BLS projects employment to be growing fast (+9.1%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • Median annual pay is $45,980, across about 131,320 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024)) • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 50% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2) Source: Singulariki — "Veterinary Technologists and Technicians". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-2056-00 Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom
Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Singulariki. "Veterinary Technologists and Technicians." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-2056-00
Singulariki. (2026). Veterinary Technologists and Technicians. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-2056-00
@misc{singulariki-role-29-2056-00,
title = {Veterinary Technologists and Technicians},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-29-2056-00}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.