Skip to content
Singulariki

Cooks, Restaurant

Occupation · SOC 35-2014.00

Prepare, season, and cook dishes such as soups, meats, vegetables, or desserts in restaurants. May order supplies, keep records and accounts, price items on menu, or plan menu.

Also called: Cook · Grill Cook · Line Cook · Prep Cook (Preparation Cook) · Back Line Cook · Banquet Cook · Breakfast Cook · Fry Cook · Prep Person (Preparation Person) · Saucier · Back of House Team Member (BOH Team Member) · Broiler Cook

Job family: Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-35-2014-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Plan and price menu items. · 2.9%
  • Weigh, measure, and mix ingredients according to recipes or personal judgment, using various kitchen utensils and equipment. · 1.6%
  • Bake, roast, broil, and steam meats, fish, vegetables, and other foods. · 0.8%
See how AI is used here →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Weigh, measure, and mix ingredients according to recipes or personal judgment, using various kitchen utensils and equipment. · 100.0% need a human
  • Bake, roast, broil, and steam meats, fish, vegetables, and other foods. · 100.0% need a human
  • Plan and price menu items. · 98.0% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

34th-percentile task overlap — yet about 250,700 openings a year (+14.9% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 3671% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Low 27th -0.7
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Low 20th 0.2
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate 60th 0.2

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.0), with simple added tooling (β 0.1), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.2). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Mixed signals. Today's AI/LLM studies show relatively low exposure for this job, but the older (2013) Frey–Osborne work rated it higher for computerization and robotics. Different eras, different technologies — the AI measures above reflect the current state.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 1.0 · 91st percentile among occupations · High

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Weigh, measure, and mix ingredients according to recipes or personal judgment, using various kitchen utensils and equipment. 3.7%
Plan and price menu items. 2.4%
Bake, roast, broil, and steam meats, fish, vegetables, and other foods. 1.6%
Turn or stir foods to ensure even cooking. 0.8%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook Growing fast · +14.9% by 2034
Projected annual openings 250,700
Employment 2024 → 2034 1,460,200 → 1,677,200

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

18% mean task exposure (2025)
29th percentile of 427 placed occupations
−1 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Cooks · 5120 18% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 36.7% working with AI · 49.8% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 10.3%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Plan and price menu items. Directive 2.9%
Weigh, measure, and mix ingredients according to recipes or personal judgment, using various kitchen utensils and equipment. Directive 1.6%
Bake, roast, broil, and steam meats, fish, vegetables, and other foods. Directive 0.8%
Ensure food is stored and cooked at correct temperature by regulating temperature of ovens, broilers, grills, and roasters. Directive 0.4%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Weigh, measure, and mix ingredients according to recipes or personal judgment, using various kitchen utensils and equipment. 100.0%
Bake, roast, broil, and steam meats, fish, vegetables, and other foods. 100.0%
Plan and price menu items. 98.0%
Ensure food is stored and cooked at correct temperature by regulating temperature of ovens, broilers, grills, and roasters. 97.2%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me plan and price menu items.

    From: Plan and price menu items. · 2.9% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me weigh, measure, and mix ingredients according to recipes or personal judgment, using various kitchen utensils and equipment.

    From: Weigh, measure, and mix ingredients according to recipes or personal judgment, using various kitchen utensils and equipment. · 1.6% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me bake, roast, broil, and steam meats, fish, vegetables, and other foods.

    From: Bake, roast, broil, and steam meats, fish, vegetables, and other foods. · 0.8% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me ensure food is stored and cooked at correct temperature by regulating temperature of ovens, broilers, grills, and roasters.

    From: Ensure food is stored and cooked at correct temperature by regulating temperature of ovens, broilers, grills, and roasters. · 0.4% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 20 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Abilities

Near Vision 3.5
Manual Dexterity 3.4
Problem Sensitivity 3.1
Oral Comprehension 3.0
Oral Expression 3.0
Information Ordering 3.0
Perceptual Speed 3.0
Selective Attention 3.0
Time Sharing 3.0
Arm-Hand Steadiness 3.0
Finger Dexterity 3.0
Control Precision 3.0
Trunk Strength 3.0
Visual Color Discrimination 3.0
Speech Recognition 3.0
Speech Clarity 3.0
Deductive Reasoning 2.9
Category Flexibility 2.9
Visualization 2.8
Multilimb Coordination 2.8
Far Vision 2.8
Written Comprehension 2.6
Fluency of Ideas 2.6
Stamina 2.6
Extent Flexibility 2.6
Inductive Reasoning 2.5

Knowledge

Food Production 3.4
English Language 3.1
Customer and Personal Service 2.6

Essential skills

Speaking 3.0
Critical Thinking 3.0
Monitoring 3.0
Active Listening 2.9
Reading Comprehension 2.8
Active Learning 2.8

Transferable skills

Time Management 3.0
Coordination 2.6
Judgment and Decision Making 2.6
Social Perceptiveness 2.5
Operations Monitoring 2.5

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Facebook Web page creation and editing software Hot technology
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
Food safety labeling systems Compliance software
Menu planning software Data base user interface and query software
Point of sale POS restaurant software Point of sale POS software
Recipe cost control software Materials requirements planning logistics and supply chain software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 4.8
Spend Time Standing 4.8
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.7
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 4.5
Contact With Others 4.1
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.1
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 4.1
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 4.1
Frequency of Decision Making 4.0
Physical Proximity 4.0
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 4.0
Health and Safety of Other Workers 3.9
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.8
Exposed to Minor Burns, Cuts, Bites, or Stings 3.8
Freedom to Make Decisions 3.8
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 3.7
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.6
Spend Time Walking or Running 3.5
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 3.4
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.3
Time Pressure 3.0
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 3.0
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 2.7
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 2.7
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 2.6
Consequence of Error 2.6
Level of Competition 2.6
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 2.5
Conflict Situations 2.5
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 2.4
Degree of Automation 2.3
Spend Time Keeping or Regaining Balance 2.2
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 2.1
Telephone Conversations 2.0
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 1.9
Exposed to Contaminants 1.9
Exposed to Hazardous Conditions 1.8
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 1.8
E-Mail 1.7
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 1.6

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
No formal educational credential · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Culinary, Entertainment, and Personal Services . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

High School Diploma 47.3%
Less than a High School Diploma 34.4%
Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 11.8%
Some College Courses 6.4%
Post-Secondary Certificate 0.1%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Interest areas

Culinary Art 6.5
Physical/Manual Labor 4.1
Management/Administration 2.5
Personal Service 1.9
Accounting 1.8
Applied Arts and Design 1.7

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Realistic 5.6
Conventional 3.8
Enterprising 3.7
Social 2.9
Artistic 2.7
Investigative 1.6

Work styles

Dependability 2.4
Attention to Detail 2.0
Cooperation 1.6
Stress Tolerance 1.6

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$28k10th$31k25th$37kMedian$44k75th$47k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
1.46M20241.68M2034 (proj.)+14.9% · Growing fast
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $28,010
25th percentile $31,310
Median (50th) $36,830
75th percentile $43,610
90th percentile $47,340
People employed 1,452,130

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 1,356,300 $36,750
Full-Service Restaurants · National industry 1,078,250 $36,770
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 49,840 $39,320
Casino Hotels · National industry 15,900 $46,160
Retail Trade · Sector 13,000 $37,470
Manufacturing · Sector 9,490 $36,960
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 9,260 $38,600
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 7,250 $36,900
Temporary Help Services · National industry 5,900 $38,340
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 2,000 $37,520
Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers · National industry 1,890 $39,320
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector 1,520 $38,680

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Full-Service Restaurants · National industry 21.36× 1,078,250
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 10.12× 1,356,300
Casino Hotels · National industry 5.01× 15,900
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 49,840
Theater Companies and Dinner Theaters · National industry 1.16× 790
Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers · National industry 0.32× 1,890
Temporary Help Services · National industry 0.24× 5,900
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 0.17× 7,250

Part of the Hospitality, Events, & Tourism career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Cooks, Restaurant sits at the 34th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 7th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Cooks, Restaurant Food Preparation Workers Food Batchmakers Chefs and Head Cooks Cooks, Private Household AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Cooks, Restaurant — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 29th percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Cooks, Restaurant show 34th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 250,700 annual U.S. openings

  • Cooks, Restaurant rank in the 34th percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 250,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be growing fast (+14.9%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $36,830, across about 1,452,130 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 37% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Cooks, Restaurant show 34th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 250,700 annual U.S. openings

• Cooks, Restaurant rank in the 34th percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 250,700 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be growing fast (+14.9%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $36,830, across about 1,452,130 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 37% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Cooks, Restaurant". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-35-2014-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Cooks, Restaurant." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-35-2014-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Cooks, Restaurant. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-35-2014-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-35-2014-00,
  title  = {Cooks, Restaurant},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-35-2014-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.