Skip to content
Singulariki

Parking Attendants

Occupation · SOC 53-6021.00

Park vehicles or issue tickets for customers in a parking lot or garage. May park or tend vehicles in environments such as a car dealership or rental car facility. May collect fee.

Also called: Parking Attendant · Parking Lot Attendant · Valet Attendant · Valet Parker · Hiker · Parking Cashier · Parking Ramp Attendant · Valet Parking Attendant · Attendant · Auto Hiker · Auto Lot Attendant (Automotive Lot Attendant) · Auto Parker

Job family: Transportation and Material Moving Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-53-6021-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Provide customer assistance and information, such as giving directions or handling wheelchairs. · 0.9%
See how AI is used here →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Provide customer assistance and information, such as giving directions or handling wheelchairs. · 97.6% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

29th-percentile task overlap — yet about 18,500 openings a year (+3% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 4118% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Low 24th -0.8
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Low 23rd 0.2
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate 45th 0.1

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.0), with simple added tooling (β 0.1), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.2). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Mixed signals. Today's AI/LLM studies show relatively low exposure for this job, but the older (2013) Frey–Osborne work rated it higher for computerization and robotics. Different eras, different technologies — the AI measures above reflect the current state.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.9 · 74th percentile among occupations · High

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Explain and calculate parking charges, collect fees from customers, and respond to customer complaints. 0.3%
Provide customer assistance and information, such as giving directions or handling wheelchairs. 0.2%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +3.0% by 2034
Projected annual openings 18,500
Employment 2024 → 2034 135,700 → 139,800

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

29% mean task exposure (2025)
55th percentile of 427 placed occupations
−9 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Elementary Workers Not Elsewhere Classified · 9629 29% Minimal

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 41.2% working with AI · 42.4% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 35.3%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Provide customer assistance and information, such as giving directions or handling wheelchairs. Directive 0.9%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Provide customer assistance and information, such as giving directions or handling wheelchairs. 97.6%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me provide customer assistance and information, such as giving directions or handling wheelchairs.

    From: Provide customer assistance and information, such as giving directions or handling wheelchairs. · 0.9% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 18 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Essential skills

Speaking 3.5
Active Listening 3.3
Critical Thinking 2.9
Writing 2.8
Mathematics 2.8
Monitoring 2.8

Abilities

Far Vision 3.5
Oral Comprehension 3.4
Oral Expression 3.4
Near Vision 3.4
Speech Recognition 3.4
Problem Sensitivity 3.3
Speech Clarity 3.3
Spatial Orientation 3.1
Deductive Reasoning 3.0
Inductive Reasoning 3.0
Information Ordering 3.0
Selective Attention 3.0
Control Precision 3.0
Multilimb Coordination 3.0
Depth Perception 3.0
Perceptual Speed 2.9
Visualization 2.9
Manual Dexterity 2.9
Reaction Time 2.9
Trunk Strength 2.9
Extent Flexibility 2.9
Visual Color Discrimination 2.9
Flexibility of Closure 2.8
Arm-Hand Steadiness 2.8
Stamina 2.8
Gross Body Coordination 2.8
Night Vision 2.8

Knowledge

Customer and Personal Service 3.5
English Language 3.1
Transportation 3.0

Transferable skills

Service Orientation 3.4
Social Perceptiveness 3.0
Coordination 2.8
Judgment and Decision Making 2.8

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
CorePark Valet Point of sale POS software
Email software Electronic mail software
Payment processing software Point of sale POS software
SMS Valet Point of sale POS software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Contact With Others 4.6
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.3
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 4.3
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 4.2
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 4.0
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.0
Physical Proximity 3.9
Spend Time Walking or Running 3.9
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 3.8
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 3.8
Telephone Conversations 3.7
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 3.6
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.6
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.5
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 3.5
Exposed to Contaminants 3.5
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 3.5
Consequence of Error 3.5
Outdoors, Under Cover 3.5
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 3.4
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 3.4
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.4
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 3.4
Frequency of Decision Making 3.2
Health and Safety of Other Workers 3.2
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.2
Spend Time Standing 3.1
Spend Time Sitting 3.1
Time Pressure 3.0
Freedom to Make Decisions 2.9
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 2.9
Conflict Situations 2.7
Written Letters and Memos 2.7
Degree of Automation 2.6
Level of Competition 2.3
Public Speaking 2.2
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 2.2
Exposed to Hazardous Equipment 2.0
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 2.0
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 1.9

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
No formal educational credential · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

High School Diploma 60.8%
Less than a High School Diploma 38.3%
Bachelor's Degree 1.0%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Realistic 5.6
Conventional 5.1
Enterprising 3.1
Social 3.0

Interest areas

Transportation/Machine Operation 4.0
Physical/Manual Labor 3.2
Personal Service 2.9
Sales 1.6
Protective Service 1.6
Accounting 1.5

Work styles

Dependability 2.0
Cooperation 1.7
Integrity 1.5
Attention to Detail 1.4
Optimism 1.4
Social Orientation 1.3

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$25k10th$30k25th$35kMedian$37k75th$44k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
136k2024140k2034 (proj.)+3.0% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $24,960
25th percentile $29,590
Median (50th) $34,600
75th percentile $37,230
90th percentile $43,840
People employed 134,650

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 73,190 $34,960
Retail Trade · Sector 22,340 $34,120
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 7,580 $33,990
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 7,150 $33,420
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector 3,940 $36,020
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 2,600 $34,700
Casino Hotels · National industry 2,580 $32,640
Wholesale Trade · Sector 2,060 $31,680
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 2,060 $37,610
Educational Services · Sector 1,680 $37,110
Full-Service Restaurants · National industry 690 $34,960
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 230 $33,560

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 18.93× 73,190
Casino Hotels · National industry 8.77× 2,580
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 3.29× 7,580
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector 1.91× 3,940
Retail Trade · Sector 1.64× 22,340
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 0.58× 7,150
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 0.4× 2,600
Wholesale Trade · Sector 0.39× 2,060

Part of the Supply Chain & Transportation career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Parking Attendants sits at the 29th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 3rd percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Parking Attendants Light Truck Drivers Parking Enforcement Workers Bus Drivers, Transit and Intercity Passenger Attendants Dispatchers, Except Police, Fire, and Ambulance AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Parking Attendants — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 55th percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Parking Attendants show 29th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 18,500 annual U.S. openings

  • Parking Attendants rank in the 29th percentile (Low band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 18,500 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+3%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $34,600, across about 134,650 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 41% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Parking Attendants show 29th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 18,500 annual U.S. openings

• Parking Attendants rank in the 29th percentile (Low band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 18,500 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+3%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $34,600, across about 134,650 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 41% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Parking Attendants". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-53-6021-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Parking Attendants." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-53-6021-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Parking Attendants. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-53-6021-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-53-6021-00,
  title  = {Parking Attendants},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-53-6021-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.