Skip to content
Singulariki

Amusement and Recreation Attendants

Occupation · SOC 39-3091.00

Perform a variety of attending duties at amusement or recreation facility. May schedule use of recreation facilities, maintain and provide equipment to participants of sporting events or recreational pursuits, or operate amusement concessions and rides.

Also called: Golf Course Ranger · Recreation Attendant · Ride Operator · Ski Lift Operator · Activities Attendant · Coaster Attendant · Golf Course Starter · Recreation Aide · Recreation Clerk · Sports Complex Attendant · Alley Worker · Amusement Attendant

Job family: Personal Care and Service Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-39-3091-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations. · 1.3%
See how AI is used here →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations. · 98.5% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

48th-percentile task overlap — yet about 102,400 openings a year (+3.4% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 5299% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) Moderate 34th -0.5
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Low 27th 0.2
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High 86th 0.3

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.2), with simple added tooling (β 0.2), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.2). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.7 · 59th percentile among occupations · Moderate

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations. 1.8%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +3.4% by 2034
Projected annual openings 102,400
Employment 2024 → 2034 392,300 → 405,500

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international 2 occupations below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

24% mean task exposure (2025)
43rd percentile of 427 placed occupations
−4 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Elementary Workers Not Elsewhere Classified · 9629 29% Minimal
Crane, hoist and related plant operators · 8343 18% Not exposed

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 53.0% working with AI · 39.5% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 3.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 32.8%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations. Directive 1.3%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations. 98.5%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations.

    From: Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations. · 1.3% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 19 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Customer and Personal Service 4.1
English Language 3.5
Public Safety and Security 3.2
Administration and Management 3.0
Sales and Marketing 2.7
Computers and Electronics 2.7
Communications and Media 2.5
Mathematics 2.5
Education and Training 2.4

Abilities

Speech Clarity 3.9
Oral Comprehension 3.8
Oral Expression 3.8
Problem Sensitivity 3.5
Speech Recognition 3.4
Near Vision 3.0
Information Ordering 2.9
Selective Attention 2.9
Written Comprehension 2.8
Deductive Reasoning 2.8
Inductive Reasoning 2.8
Arm-Hand Steadiness 2.8
Trunk Strength 2.8
Far Vision 2.8
Written Expression 2.6
Manual Dexterity 2.6
Control Precision 2.6
Multilimb Coordination 2.5

Essential skills

Speaking 3.3
Active Listening 3.0
Monitoring 2.9
Critical Thinking 2.8
Writing 2.5
Reading Comprehension 2.4
Active Learning 2.4

Transferable skills

Service Orientation 3.1
Social Perceptiveness 3.0
Coordination 2.9
Judgment and Decision Making 2.6
Time Management 2.6
Persuasion 2.4

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Facebook Web page creation and editing software Hot technology
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft Windows Operating system software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
Adobe PageMaker Desktop publishing software
Database software Data base user interface and query software
Microsoft Internet Explorer Internet browser software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 5.0
Contact With Others 4.9
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 4.8
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 4.2
Spend Time Standing 4.1
Physical Proximity 3.9
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 3.8
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.6
Spend Time Walking or Running 3.5
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 3.5
Public Speaking 3.5
Freedom to Make Decisions 3.5
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 3.4
Outdoors, Under Cover 3.3
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.3
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 3.2
Frequency of Decision Making 3.2
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 3.2
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.1
Exposed to Very Hot or Cold Temperatures 3.1
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.1
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 2.9
Health and Safety of Other Workers 2.9
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 2.9
Conflict Situations 2.8
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 2.8
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 2.6
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 2.5
E-Mail 2.5
Telephone Conversations 2.3
Spend Time Sitting 2.3
Consequence of Error 2.1
In an Open Vehicle or Operating Equipment 2.1
Time Pressure 2.0
Exposed to Contaminants 2.0
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 1.9
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 1.9
Written Letters and Memos 1.8
Degree of Automation 1.8
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 1.8

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
No formal educational credential · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

Less than a High School Diploma 64.2%
High School Diploma 31.9%
Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 2.5%
Bachelor's Degree 1.4%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Conventional 4.7
Social 4.3
Realistic 4.2
Enterprising 3.8
Artistic 1.7

Interest areas

Personal Service 4.4
Sales 2.7
Physical/Manual Labor 2.5
Transportation/Machine Operation 2.4
Athletics 2.2
Protective Service 2.1
Accounting 1.9
Public Speaking 1.7
Management/Administration 1.7

Work styles

Dependability 2.1
Cooperation 1.8

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$22k10th$26k25th$30kMedian$35k75th$40k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
392k2024406k2034 (proj.)+3.4% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $21,940
25th percentile $26,430
Median (50th) $30,490
75th percentile $35,360
90th percentile $39,940
People employed 371,590

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 276,690 $29,910
Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers · National industry 51,150 $31,580
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 19,650 $33,280
Educational Services · Sector 11,200 $30,110
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 7,550 $31,290
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 4,710 $33,280
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector 4,270 $33,080
Casino Hotels · National industry 2,750 $29,770
Temporary Help Services · National industry 2,480 $32,770
Information · Sector 1,900 $25,010
Retail Trade · Sector 1,680 $30,170
Sporting Goods Retailers · National industry 1,380 $31,190

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 43.45× 276,690
Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers · National industry 33.67× 51,150
Casino Hotels · National industry 3.39× 2,750
Sporting Goods Retailers · National industry 1.92× 1,380
Theater Companies and Dinner Theaters · National industry 1.38× 240
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector 0.75× 4,270
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 0.71× 7,550
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 0.57× 19,650

Part of the Hospitality, Events, & Tourism career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Amusement and Recreation Attendants sits at the 48th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 1st percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Amusement and Recreation Attendants Dining Room and Cafeteria Attendants and Bartender Helpers Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand Baggage Porters and Bellhops Entertainment and Recreation Managers, Except Gambling First-Line Supervisors of Gambling Services Workers Counter and Rental Clerks Dispatchers, Except Police, Fire, and Ambulance AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Amusement and Recreation Attendants — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 43rd percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Amusement and Recreation Attendants show 48th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 102,400 annual U.S. openings

  • Amusement and Recreation Attendants rank in the 48th percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 102,400 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+3.4%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $30,490, across about 371,590 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 53% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Amusement and Recreation Attendants show 48th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 102,400 annual U.S. openings

• Amusement and Recreation Attendants rank in the 48th percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 102,400 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+3.4%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $30,490, across about 371,590 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 53% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Amusement and Recreation Attendants". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-3091-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Amusement and Recreation Attendants." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-3091-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Amusement and Recreation Attendants. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-3091-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-39-3091-00,
  title  = {Amusement and Recreation Attendants},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-3091-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.