Skip to content
Singulariki

Concierges

Occupation · SOC 39-6012.00

Assist patrons at hotel, apartment, or office building with personal services. May take messages; arrange or give advice on transportation, business services, or entertainment; or monitor guest requests for housekeeping and maintenance.

Also called: Chef Concierge · Concierge · Guest Service Agent · Hotel Concierge · Activities Concierge · Club Concierge · Conference Concierge · Front Desk Agent · Lobby Concierge · Service Concierge · Concierge Security Officer · Event Concierge

Job family: Personal Care and Service Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-39-6012-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Provide information about local features, such as shopping, dining, nightlife, or recreational destinations. · 5.5%
See how AI is used here →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Provide information about local features, such as shopping, dining, nightlife, or recreational destinations. · 100.0% need a human
  • Provide business services for guests, such as sending or receiving faxes or shipping packages. · 100.0% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

78th-percentile task overlap — yet about 6,800 openings a year (+2.3% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 4035% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High 69th 0.9
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate 65th 0.8
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High 98th 0.4

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.5), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.8). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

This job mostly cannot be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman) — its hands-on tasks sit outside what software-based AI reaches.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.2 · 33rd percentile among occupations · Low

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Provide information about local features, such as shopping, dining, nightlife, or recreational destinations. 4.4%
Make travel arrangements for sightseeing or other tours. 0.3%
Make reservations for patrons, such as for dinner, spa treatments, or golf tee times, and obtain tickets to special events. 0.2%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +2.3% by 2034
Projected annual openings 6,800
Employment 2024 → 2034 45,600 → 46,700

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

51% mean task exposure (2025)
89th percentile of 427 placed occupations
−16 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Hotel Receptionists · 4224 51% Gradient 3

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 40.4% working with AI · 51.7% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 3.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 8.5%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Provide information about local features, such as shopping, dining, nightlife, or recreational destinations. Directive 5.5%
Provide business services for guests, such as sending or receiving faxes or shipping packages. 0.3%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Provide information about local features, such as shopping, dining, nightlife, or recreational destinations. 100.0%
Provide business services for guests, such as sending or receiving faxes or shipping packages. 100.0%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me provide information about local features, such as shopping, dining, nightlife, or recreational destinations.

    From: Provide information about local features, such as shopping, dining, nightlife, or recreational destinations. · 5.5% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me provide business services for guests, such as sending or receiving faxes or shipping packages.

    From: Provide business services for guests, such as sending or receiving faxes or shipping packages. · 0.3% of measured AI use

Tasks

All 16 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

Customer and Personal Service 4.7
English Language 4.4
Administrative 3.3
Transportation 3.1
Administration and Management 2.9
Computers and Electronics 2.9
Public Safety and Security 2.8
Sales and Marketing 2.7
Psychology 2.6

Abilities

Oral Comprehension 4.1
Oral Expression 4.1
Speech Recognition 3.9
Speech Clarity 3.9
Problem Sensitivity 3.5
Deductive Reasoning 3.5
Information Ordering 3.1
Written Comprehension 3.0
Written Expression 3.0
Fluency of Ideas 3.0
Originality 3.0
Inductive Reasoning 3.0
Near Vision 3.0
Category Flexibility 2.9
Selective Attention 2.9
Time Sharing 2.8

Essential skills

Active Listening 4.0
Speaking 4.0
Reading Comprehension 3.0
Critical Thinking 3.0
Monitoring 3.0
Active Learning 2.9
Writing 2.8

Transferable skills

Social Perceptiveness 4.0
Service Orientation 4.0
Coordination 3.5
Persuasion 3.0
Judgment and Decision Making 3.0
Time Management 3.0
Complex Problem Solving 2.9
Negotiation 2.8

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
Yardi software Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Billing software Billing and invoicing software
Budgeting software Accounting software
Delphi Technology Financial analysis software
Mapping software Map creation software
Microsoft Publisher Desktop publishing software
Web browser software Internet browser software
Work scheduling software Calendar and scheduling software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

E-Mail 5.0
Telephone Conversations 4.9
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.8
Contact With Others 4.7
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.6
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 4.5
Freedom to Make Decisions 4.4
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 4.3
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 4.0
Time Pressure 3.9
Written Letters and Memos 3.8
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 3.8
Physical Proximity 3.6
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.5
Spend Time Standing 3.4
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 3.3
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.3
Frequency of Decision Making 3.2
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 3.2
Conflict Situations 3.1
Health and Safety of Other Workers 3.0
Public Speaking 2.9
Spend Time Sitting 2.9
Level of Competition 2.8
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 2.7
Spend Time Walking or Running 2.5
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 2.5
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 2.2
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 2.2
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 2.0
Degree of Automation 2.0
Consequence of Error 1.9
Dealing with Violent or Physically Aggressive People 1.8
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 1.8
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 1.8
Exposed to Contaminants 1.8
Spend Time Kneeling, Crouching, Stooping, or Crawling 1.7
Spend Time Keeping or Regaining Balance 1.7
Outdoors, Under Cover 1.6
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 1.6

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 2 — Job Zone 1-2: Very Little to Some Preparation Needed
Education
Usually requires a high school diploma or GED, though some occupations may not.
Typical entry-level education
High school diploma or equivalent · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
Some occupations may need little or no previous experience; others require several months to a year of experience. For example, landscaping and groundskeeping workers might require very little training or previous experience, while agricultural equipment operators can benefit from on-the job training.
Preparation level
SVP (Below 6.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Culinary, Entertainment, and Personal Services . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

High School Diploma 45.5%
Some College Courses 27.3%
Post-Secondary Certificate 9.1%
Bachelor's Degree 9.1%
Less than a High School Diploma 4.5%
Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) 4.5%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Interest areas

Personal Service 6.9
Management/Administration 2.5
Office Work 2.4
Sales 2.4
Professional Advising 2.4
Social Service 2.1

Work styles

Dependability 6.0
Cooperation 5.0
Social Orientation 4.0
Empathy 3.0
Optimism 2.5

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Social 5.3
Enterprising 4.7
Conventional 4.2
Realistic 2.7
Artistic 2.3

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$31k10th$34k25th$37kMedian$46k75th$58k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
46k202447k2034 (proj.)+2.3% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $30,770
25th percentile $33,860
Median (50th) $37,320
75th percentile $45,700
90th percentile $58,050
People employed 44,200

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 10,590 $35,640
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 9,480 $39,470
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector 8,920 $44,780
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 5,110 $37,080
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 4,840 $35,710
Temporary Help Services · National industry 2,330 $36,630
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 1,980 $35,510
Transportation and Warehousing · Sector 1,220 $34,330
Casino Hotels · National industry 720 $41,540
Information · Sector 630 $37,040
Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers · National industry 220 $36,240
Construction · Sector 170 $45,710

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector 13.14× 8,920
Casino Hotels · National industry 7.45× 720
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 3.81× 4,840
Temporary Help Services · National industry 3.07× 2,330
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 2.61× 1,980
Accommodation and Food Services · Sector 2.32× 9,480
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 1.97× 5,110
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 1.6× 10,590

Part of the Hospitality, Events, & Tourism career cluster.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Concierges sits at the 78th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 8th percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Concierges Parking Attendants Hosts and Hostesses, Restaurant, Lounge, and Coffee Shop Lodging Managers Reservation and Transportation Ticket Agents and Travel Clerks Receptionists and Information Clerks Travel Agents AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Concierges — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 89th percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Concierges show 78th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 6,800 annual U.S. openings

  • Concierges rank in the 78th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 6,800 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+2.3%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $37,320, across about 44,200 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 40% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Concierges show 78th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 6,800 annual U.S. openings

• Concierges rank in the 78th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 6,800 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+2.3%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $37,320, across about 44,200 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 40% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Concierges". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-6012-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Concierges." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-6012-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Concierges. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-6012-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-39-6012-00,
  title  = {Concierges},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-39-6012-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.