Skip to content
Singulariki

Social Science Research Assistants

Occupation · SOC 19-4061.00

Assist social scientists in laboratory, survey, and other social science research. May help prepare findings for publication and assist in laboratory analysis, quality control, or data management.

Also called: Graduate Research Assistant · Research Assistant · Research Associate · Social Research Assistant · Clinical Research Assistant · Graduate Assistant · Research Aide · Research Technician · Bilingual Research Interviewer · Data Analyst · Economic Research Assistant · Economist Research Assistant

Job family: Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

Take this to your AI
Download .md

A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch /roles/role-19-4061-00/context.md directly.

AI work map

A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.

Often handed to AI

Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.

  • Conduct internet-based and library research. · 12.2%
  • Prepare tables, graphs, fact sheets, and written reports summarizing research results. · 6.7%
  • Prepare, manipulate, and manage extensive databases. · 5.0%
See how AI is used here →

Use as a copilot

Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.

  • Provide assistance in the design of survey instruments such as questionnaires. · 2.3%
  • Present research findings to groups of people. · 1.3%
  • Edit and submit protocols and other required research documentation. · 1.1%
See collaboration patterns →

Keep a human in the loop

Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.

  • Conduct internet-based and library research. · 99.0% need a human
  • Provide assistance with the preparation of project-related reports, manuscripts, and presentations. · 97.8% need a human
  • Present research findings to groups of people. · 96.3% need a human
See the boundary tasks →

78th-percentile task overlap — yet about 5,200 openings a year (+4.4% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 5142% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →

AI & job outlook

What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.

Exposure to current AI

Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.

Measure Rank vs all occupations Percentile Score
Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High 82nd 1.2
LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) High 79th 0.9
AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) High 69th 0.2

OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.4), with simple added tooling (β 0.7), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.9). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.

Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.

Historical automation estimate (2013)

A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.

Frey–Osborne probability 0.7 · 55th percentile among occupations · Moderate

How AI is actually used in this job

Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.

Prepare tables, graphs, fact sheets, and written reports summarizing research results. 12.6%
Provide assistance in the design of survey instruments such as questionnaires. 3.7%
Prepare, manipulate, and manage extensive databases. 2.9%
Design and create special programs for tasks such as statistical analysis and data entry and cleaning. 2.6%
Edit and submit protocols and other required research documentation. 1.7%
Conduct internet-based and library research. 1.2%

Job outlook

Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.

Outlook About average · +4.4% by 2034
Projected annual openings 5,200
Employment 2024 → 2034 40,600 → 42,300

“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.

Where this work sits on the global GenAI gradient

The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.

57% mean task exposure (2025)
94th percentile of 427 placed occupations
+8 pts shift 2023 → 2025
International occupation (ISCO-08) Task exposure (2025) Most tasks fall in
Statistical, Mathematical and Related Associate Professionals · 3314 57% Gradient 3

Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.

Working with AI in this job

How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.

Augmentation vs. automation 51.4% working with AI · 45.1% handed to AI
Most common way people use AI here Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction
Typical AI autonomy 4.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently
Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) 38.3%

What people delegate to AI

The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.

Task How Usage
Conduct internet-based and library research. Directive 12.2%
Prepare tables, graphs, fact sheets, and written reports summarizing research results. Directive 6.7%
Prepare, manipulate, and manage extensive databases. Directive 5.0%
Design and create special programs for tasks such as statistical analysis and data entry and cleaning. Directive 4.2%
Provide assistance in the design of survey instruments such as questionnaires. Learning 2.3%
Provide assistance with the preparation of project-related reports, manuscripts, and presentations. Directive 1.4%
Present research findings to groups of people. Learning 1.3%
Edit and submit protocols and other required research documentation. Iteration 1.1%

Where a human is still needed

Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.

Conduct internet-based and library research. 99.0%
Provide assistance with the preparation of project-related reports, manuscripts, and presentations. 97.8%
Present research findings to groups of people. 96.3%
Prepare, manipulate, and manage extensive databases. 90.1%
Edit and submit protocols and other required research documentation. 89.8%
Provide assistance in the design of survey instruments such as questionnaires. 89.6%

What people most often hand AI here

Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.

  • Help me conduct internet-based and library research.

    From: Conduct internet-based and library research. · 12.2% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me prepare tables, graphs, fact sheets, and written reports summarizing research results.

    From: Prepare tables, graphs, fact sheets, and written reports summarizing research results. · 6.7% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me prepare, manipulate, and manage extensive databases.

    From: Prepare, manipulate, and manage extensive databases. · 5.0% of measured AI use · directive

  • Help me design and create special programs for tasks such as statistical analysis and data entry and cleaning.

    From: Design and create special programs for tasks such as statistical analysis and data entry and cleaning. · 4.2% of measured AI use · directive

Tasks

All 23 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.

Emerging tasks

Newer responsibilities O*NET has flagged as growing for this occupation.

  • Write grant proposals.

Work activities

Knowledge, skills & abilities

O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).

Knowledge

English Language 4.3
Computers and Electronics 3.5
Administrative 3.2
Mathematics 3.1
Customer and Personal Service 3.0
Education and Training 2.9

Essential skills

Reading Comprehension 4.0
Active Listening 3.8
Writing 3.8
Critical Thinking 3.8
Speaking 3.4
Science 3.3
Mathematics 3.1
Active Learning 3.1
Learning Strategies 3.0
Monitoring 2.9

Abilities

Oral Comprehension 4.0
Written Comprehension 4.0
Oral Expression 4.0
Written Expression 3.8
Information Ordering 3.6
Deductive Reasoning 3.5
Near Vision 3.4
Inductive Reasoning 3.3
Speech Clarity 3.3
Problem Sensitivity 3.1
Mathematical Reasoning 3.1
Selective Attention 3.1
Speech Recognition 3.1
Fluency of Ideas 3.0
Originality 3.0
Category Flexibility 3.0
Number Facility 3.0

Transferable skills

Complex Problem Solving 3.4
Judgment and Decision Making 3.1
Systems Analysis 3.0
Social Perceptiveness 2.9
Coordination 2.9
Systems Evaluation 2.9
Time Management 2.9

Skills in demand

Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.

Showing the top 40 of 43.

Tools & technology

Example Category
Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft Office software Office suite software Hot technology In demand
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation software Hot technology In demand
Python Object or component oriented development software Hot technology In demand
R Object or component oriented development software Hot technology In demand
Adobe Illustrator Graphics or photo imaging software Hot technology
Adobe InDesign Desktop publishing software Hot technology
C++ Object or component oriented development software Hot technology
ESRI ArcGIS software Geographic information system Hot technology
Extensible markup language XML Enterprise application integration software Hot technology
IBM SPSS Statistics Analytical or scientific software Hot technology
JavaScript Web platform development software Hot technology
Microsoft Access Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Microsoft Outlook Electronic mail software Hot technology
Microsoft SQL Server Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Microsoft Visual Basic Development environment software Hot technology
Microsoft Word Word processing software Hot technology
Oracle Java Object or component oriented development software Hot technology
Perl Object or component oriented development software Hot technology
SAS Analytical or scientific software Hot technology
Structured query language SQL Data base user interface and query software Hot technology
Tableau Business intelligence and data analysis software Hot technology
The MathWorks MATLAB Analytical or scientific software Hot technology
Appletree Computer based training software
Database software Data base user interface and query software
Graphics software Graphics or photo imaging software
Online library databases Information retrieval or search software
Qualtrics Insight Project management software
REDCap Research Electronic Data Capture Analytical or scientific software
StataCorp Stata Analytical or scientific software
Statistical software Analytical or scientific software
Video development software Video creation and editing software
Web browser software Internet browser software

Work context

How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.

Spend Time Sitting 4.7
E-Mail 4.6
Face-to-Face Discussions with Individuals and Within Teams 4.3
Indoors, Environmentally Controlled 4.2
Work With or Contribute to a Work Group or Team 4.2
Importance of Being Exact or Accurate 4.0
Freedom to Make Decisions 3.9
Determine Tasks, Priorities and Goals 3.9
Importance of Repeating Same Tasks 3.8
Contact With Others 3.7
Telephone Conversations 3.4
Coordinate or Lead Others in Accomplishing Work Activities 3.1
Written Letters and Memos 3.0
Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results 3.0
Physical Proximity 2.9
Time Pressure 2.9
Deal With External Customers or the Public in General 2.7
Level of Competition 2.7
Spend Time Making Repetitive Motions 2.5
Work Outcomes and Results of Other Workers 2.5
Exposed to Sounds, Noise Levels that are Distracting or Uncomfortable 2.3
Frequency of Decision Making 2.3
Dealing With Unpleasant, Angry, or Discourteous People 1.9
Consequence of Error 1.9
Public Speaking 1.9
Health and Safety of Other Workers 1.8
Conflict Situations 1.8
Spend Time Standing 1.7
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or Controls 1.7
Exposed to Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting Conditions 1.7
Degree of Automation 1.6
Spend Time Walking or Running 1.4
In an Enclosed Vehicle or Operate Enclosed Equipment 1.4
Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment 1.3
Exposed to Contaminants 1.3
Exposed to Cramped Work Space, Awkward Positions 1.3
Outdoors, Exposed to All Weather Conditions 1.2
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life Jackets 1.2
Indoors, Not Environmentally Controlled 1.2
Spend Time Bending or Twisting Your Body 1.1

How to get in

Job zone
Zone 4 — Job Zone Four: Considerable Preparation Needed
Education
Most of these occupations require a four-year bachelor's degree, but some do not.
Typical entry-level education
Bachelor's degree · BLS, the typical path — not a requirement
Related experience
A considerable amount of work-related skill, knowledge, or experience is needed for these occupations. For example, an accountant must complete four years of college and work for several years in accounting to be considered qualified.
Preparation level
SVP (7.0 to < 8.0) — total schooling plus on-the-job experience.

What to study: Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies , Natural Resources and Conservation , Psychology , Public Administration and Social Service Professions , Social Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.

Education of current workers

Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.

Bachelor's Degree 52.7%
Master's Degree 36.7%
Some College Courses 8.6%
Post-Baccalaureate Certificate 1.6%
Doctoral Degree 0.4%

Interests & work styles

The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.

Career interests (Holland / RIASEC)

Investigative 6.1
Conventional 5.9
Social 2.7
Realistic 2.4
Enterprising 2.3

Interest areas

Mathematics/Statistics 5.2
Social Science 5.1
Office Work 4.2
Information Technology 3.2
Humanities 2.5
Public Speaking 2.2
Accounting 2.2

Work styles

Dependability 3.0
Attention to Detail 2.6
Intellectual Curiosity 2.2
Integrity 2.0

Wages & employment

U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)

$36k10th$46k25th$58kMedian$73k75th$101k90th
Annual wages by percentile — U.S. (BLS OEWS). The light band spans the 10th–90th percentile; the darker band is the middle half (25th–75th); the line is the median.
41k202442k2034 (proj.)+4.4% · About average
Projected U.S. employment, 2024–2034 (BLS Employment Projections). A labor-market forecast for the occupation, not an AI-impact forecast.
10th percentile $36,410
25th percentile $46,190
Median (50th) $58,040
75th percentile $73,060
90th percentile $100,620
People employed 32,940

Industries that employ this occupation

Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.

Industry Workers National median pay
Educational Services · Sector 15,460 $52,630
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 12,950 $62,330
Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities · National industry 6,450 $60,800
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 1,980 $50,240
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 1,030 $46,960
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 240 $51,220
Manufacturing · Sector 190 $84,480
Temporary Help Services · National industry 180 $51,220
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 150 $62,750
Information · Sector 60 $59,600
Finance and Insurance · Sector 60 $65,580
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation · Sector 30 $38,350

Where this work is most concentrated

Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).

Industry Concentration Workers
Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities · National industry 496.65× 6,450
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector 5.63× 12,950
Educational Services · Sector 5.31× 15,460
Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector 1.09× 1,030
Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector 0.4× 1,980
Temporary Help Services · National industry 0.32× 180
Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector 0.25× 150
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector 0.12× 240

Part of the Healthcare & Human Services and Public Service & Safety career clusters.

Exposure quadrant: AI task-overlap percentile vs Median pay Social Science Research Assistants sits at the 78th percentile of AI task-overlap and the 43rd percentile of median pay, placed here against 12 adjacent occupations on the same two axes. Lower overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · higher pay Higher overlap · lower pay Lower overlap · lower pay Social Science Research Assistants Teaching Assistants, Postsecondary Clinical Research Coordinators Education Administrators, Postsecondary Survey Researchers Statistical Assistants Bioinformatics Technicians Clinical Data Managers AI task-overlap percentile → ↑ Median pay
AI task-overlap percentile (horizontal) vs. median-pay percentile (vertical), across all scored occupations. This occupation is highlighted; related occupations are plotted alongside it. Overlap measures shared tasks with AI, not automation.

Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.

What you can do with this

Options the data surfaces for Social Science Research Assistants — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.

Skills that travel

Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.

Paths in

How people typically prepare for this work.

Zoom out

On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 94th percentile of 427 international occupations.

Write a report on thisheadline · factoids · citation

Social Science Research Assistants show 78th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 5,200 annual U.S. openings

  • Social Science Research Assistants rank in the 78th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated.Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE
  • The occupation is projected to see about 5,200 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • BLS projects employment to be about average (+4.4%) from 2024 to 2034.BLS Employment Projections 2024–34
  • Median annual pay is $58,040, across about 32,940 U.S. workers.BLS OEWS (May 2024)
  • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 51% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census.2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2
Copy the whole kit
Social Science Research Assistants show 78th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 5,200 annual U.S. openings

• Social Science Research Assistants rank in the 78th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE)
• The occupation is projected to see about 5,200 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• BLS projects employment to be about average (+4.4%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34)
• Median annual pay is $58,040, across about 32,940 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024))
• Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 51% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2)

Source: Singulariki — "Social Science Research Assistants". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-4061-00
Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom

Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.

Sources for this page

Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.

Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.

Cite this page
Plain

Singulariki. "Social Science Research Assistants." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-4061-00

APA

Singulariki. (2026). Social Science Research Assistants. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-4061-00

BibTeX
@misc{singulariki-role-19-4061-00,
  title  = {Social Science Research Assistants},
  author = {{Singulariki}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
  url    = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-19-4061-00}
}

Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.

Embed this chart

Paste this into any page. It links back here for attribution.