Occupation · SOC 11-9121.01
Plan, direct, or coordinate clinical research projects. Direct the activities of workers engaged in clinical research projects to ensure compliance with protocols and overall clinical objectives. May evaluate and analyze clinical data.
Also called: Clinical Program Manager · Clinical Research Coordinator · Clinical Trial Manager · Research Coordinator · Clinical Coordinator · Clinical Program Coordinator · Clinical Research Administrator · Clinical Research Manager · Clinical Research Nurse Coordinator · Clinical Trial Coordinator · Clinical Data Coordinator · Clinical Manager
Job family: Management Occupations
A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch
/roles/role-11-9121-01/context.md directly.
A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.
Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.
Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.
Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.
The capabilities O*NET rates most important for this occupation — the human ground the work is built on.
See all skills →Independent published positions, read together — not a forecast.
67th-percentile task overlap — yet about 8,500 openings a year (+3.7% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 2654% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →
What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.
Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.
| Measure | Rank vs all occupations | Percentile | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High | 89th | 1.3 | |
| LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) High | 78th | 0.9 | |
| AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate | 34th | 0.1 |
OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.2), with simple added tooling (β 0.5), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.9). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.
Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.
A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.
Frey–Osborne probability 0.0 · 13th percentile among occupations · Low
Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.
| Code, evaluate, or interpret collected study data. | 2.8% | |
| Collaborate with investigators to prepare presentations or reports of clinical study procedures, results, and conclusions. | 0.6% | |
| Inform patients or caregivers about study aspects and outcomes to be expected. | 0.5% | |
| Review scientific literature, participate in continuing education activities, or attend conferences and seminars to maintain current knowledge of clinical studies affairs and issues. | 0.4% | |
| Interpret protocols and advise treating physicians on appropriate dosage modifications or treatment calculations based on patient characteristics. | 0.3% | |
| Communicate with laboratories or investigators regarding laboratory findings. | 0.3% |
Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.
| Outlook | About average · +3.7% by 2034 |
| Projected annual openings | 8,500 |
| Employment 2024 → 2034 | 104,300 → 108,200 |
“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.
The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.
| International occupation (ISCO-08) | Task exposure (2025) | Most tasks fall in |
|---|---|---|
| Research and Development Managers · 1223 | 40% | Minimal |
Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.
How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.
| Augmentation vs. automation | 26.5% working with AI · 64.4% handed to AI |
| Most common way people use AI here | Directive · AI does it; you give the instruction |
| Typical AI autonomy | 3.5 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently |
| Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) | 69.9% |
The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.
| Task | How | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Code, evaluate, or interpret collected study data. | Directive | 7.3% |
| Prepare study-related documentation such as protocol worksheets, procedural manuals, adverse event reports, institutional review board documents, and progress reports. | Iteration | 1.8% |
| Inform patients or caregivers about study aspects and outcomes to be expected. | Learning | 0.7% |
| Review proposed study protocols to evaluate factors such as sample collection processes, data management plans, and potential subject risks. | Learning | 0.6% |
| Participate in the development of study protocols including guidelines for administration or data collection procedures. | Iteration | 0.5% |
| Collaborate with investigators to prepare presentations or reports of clinical study procedures, results, and conclusions. | Directive | 0.4% |
Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.
| Inform patients or caregivers about study aspects and outcomes to be expected. | 98.5% | |
| Code, evaluate, or interpret collected study data. | 96.4% | |
| Review proposed study protocols to evaluate factors such as sample collection processes, data management plans, and potential subject risks. | 93.2% | |
| Prepare study-related documentation such as protocol worksheets, procedural manuals, adverse event reports, institutional review board documents, and progress reports. | 92.8% | |
| Collaborate with investigators to prepare presentations or reports of clinical study procedures, results, and conclusions. | 92.5% | |
| Participate in the development of study protocols including guidelines for administration or data collection procedures. | 91.3% |
Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.
Help me code, evaluate, or interpret collected study data. From: Code, evaluate, or interpret collected study data. · 7.3% of measured AI use · directive
Help me prepare study-related documentation such as protocol worksheets, procedural manuals, adverse event reports, institutional review board documents, and progress reports. From: Prepare study-related documentation such as protocol worksheets, procedural manuals, adverse event reports, institutional review board documents, and progress reports. · 1.8% of measured AI use · task iteration
Help me inform patients or caregivers about study aspects and outcomes to be expected. From: Inform patients or caregivers about study aspects and outcomes to be expected. · 0.7% of measured AI use · learning
Help me review proposed study protocols to evaluate factors such as sample collection processes, data management plans, and potential subject risks. From: Review proposed study protocols to evaluate factors such as sample collection processes, data management plans, and potential subject risks. · 0.6% of measured AI use · learning
All 33 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.
O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
| Customer and Personal Service | 4.3 | |
| English Language | 3.8 | |
| Administrative | 3.7 | |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3.2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Active Listening | 4.0 | |
| Writing | 4.0 | |
| Speaking | 3.9 | |
| Critical Thinking | 3.8 | |
| Monitoring | 3.6 | |
| Active Learning | 3.4 | |
| Learning Strategies | 3.1 | |
| Science | 3.0 |
| Oral Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Written Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Oral Expression | 4.0 | |
| Written Expression | 4.0 | |
| Problem Sensitivity | 4.0 | |
| Deductive Reasoning | 4.0 | |
| Inductive Reasoning | 3.9 | |
| Information Ordering | 3.9 | |
| Speech Recognition | 3.8 | |
| Speech Clarity | 3.8 | |
| Near Vision | 3.6 | |
| Category Flexibility | 3.3 | |
| Fluency of Ideas | 3.0 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 3.0 | |
| Number Facility | 3.0 | |
| Flexibility of Closure | 3.0 | |
| Perceptual Speed | 3.0 | |
| Far Vision | 3.0 |
| Coordination | 3.9 | |
| Social Perceptiveness | 3.6 | |
| Complex Problem Solving | 3.6 | |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 3.6 | |
| Time Management | 3.5 | |
| Management of Personnel Resources | 3.5 | |
| Instructing | 3.1 | |
| Persuasion | 3.0 | |
| Service Orientation | 3.0 |
Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.
Showing the top 40 of 44.
Showing the top 40 of 44.
How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.
What to study: Biological and Biomedical Sciences , Business, Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services , Engineering , Health Professions and Related Programs , History , Mathematics and Statistics , Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies , Philosophy and Religious Studies , Physical Sciences . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.
Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.
| Bachelor's Degree | 60.1% | |
| Post-Secondary Certificate | 11.6% | |
| Some College Courses | 9.2% | |
| High School Diploma | 7.0% | |
| Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) | 5.9% | |
| Master's Degree | 4.8% | |
| Doctoral Degree | 1.3% |
The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.
| Dependability | 9.0 | |
| Attention to Detail | 8.0 | |
| Integrity | 7.0 | |
| Cautiousness | 6.0 | |
| Intellectual Curiosity | 5.0 | |
| Cooperation | 4.0 |
| Investigative | 5.9 | |
| Conventional | 4.8 | |
| Enterprising | 4.3 | |
| Social | 3.6 |
| Medical Science | 5.4 | |
| Health Care Service | 4.5 | |
| Life Science | 4.4 | |
| Management/Administration | 4.2 | |
| Office Work | 3.6 | |
| Social Science | 3.1 |
U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)
| 10th percentile | $79,830 |
| 25th percentile | $114,110 |
| Median (50th) | $161,180 |
| 75th percentile | $214,820 |
| 90th percentile | — |
| People employed | 100,870 |
Wages and employment are reported by BLS for the broader occupation group this specialty belongs to (SOC 11-9121), not for the specialty alone.
Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.
| Industry | Workers | National median pay |
|---|---|---|
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector | 49,690 | $180,800 |
| Manufacturing · Sector | 8,090 | $176,600 |
| Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector | 6,670 | $101,730 |
| Educational Services · Sector | 5,200 | $84,360 |
| Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector | 4,340 | $178,300 |
| Wholesale Trade · Sector | 3,930 | $207,590 |
| Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry | 2,310 | $117,350 |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector | 1,200 | $120,890 |
| Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector | 900 | $139,840 |
| Engineering Services · National industry | 880 | $150,160 |
| Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities · National industry | 720 | $128,700 |
| Finance and Insurance · Sector | 500 | $160,940 |
Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).
| Industry | Concentration | Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Testing Laboratories and Services · National industry | 20.72× | 2,310 |
| Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities · National industry | 18.1× | 720 |
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector | 7.05× | 49,690 |
| Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector | 2.36× | 4,340 |
| Engineering Services · National industry | 1.16× | 880 |
| Wholesale Trade · Sector | 1× | 3,930 |
| Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers · National industry | 0.99× | 290 |
| Manufacturing · Sector | 0.97× | 8,090 |
Part of the Advanced Manufacturing , Energy & Natural Resources , Healthcare & Human Services and Supply Chain & Transportation career clusters.
Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.
Options the data surfaces for Clinical Research Coordinators — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.
Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.
Occupations O*NET rates as related — the nearby moves on the map.
How people typically prepare for this work.
On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 77th percentile of 427 international occupations.
Clinical Research Coordinators show 67th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 8,500 annual U.S. openings
Clinical Research Coordinators show 67th-percentile AI task overlap — and about 8,500 annual U.S. openings • Clinical Research Coordinators rank in the 67th percentile (High band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE) • The occupation is projected to see about 8,500 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • BLS projects employment to be about average (+3.7%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • Median annual pay is $161,180, across about 100,870 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024)) • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 27% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2) Source: Singulariki — "Clinical Research Coordinators". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9121-01 Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom
Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Singulariki. "Clinical Research Coordinators." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9121-01
Singulariki. (2026). Clinical Research Coordinators. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9121-01
@misc{singulariki-role-11-9121-01,
title = {Clinical Research Coordinators},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9121-01}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.