Often handed to AI
Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.
- Research and analyze member or community needs to determine program directions and goals. · 0.8%
Occupation · SOC 11-9151.00
Plan, direct, or coordinate the activities of a social service program or community outreach organization. Oversee the program or organization's budget and policies regarding participant involvement, program requirements, and benefits. Work may involve directing social workers, counselors, or probation officers.
Also called: Child Welfare Services Director · Social Services Director · Transitional Care Director · Vocational Rehabilitation Administrator · Adoption Services Manager · Children's Service Supervisor · Clinical Services Director · Community Services Director · Psychiatric Social Worker Supervisor · Adult Daycare Coordinator · Borough Coordinator · Case Manager
Job family: Management Occupations
A source-stamped Markdown brief of this occupation — paste it into an agent, or fetch
/roles/role-11-9151-00/context.md directly.
A fast read on where AI already shows up in this occupation, where it stays a copilot, where humans remain in the loop, and what the labor market is doing. Built from observed Claude.ai conversations mapped to O*NET tasks and from published research — measures of usage and exposure, not advice or predictions that the job is going away.
Task areas most often handled directively in observed AI conversations — candidates to delegate with light review.
Task areas where people work with AI — iterating, learning, or checking — staying in the loop rather than handing the task off.
Task areas where a human was still judged necessary in a large share of observed conversations — not a safety ruling, an observed-need signal.
The capabilities O*NET rates most important for this occupation — the human ground the work is built on.
See all skills →Independent published positions, read together — not a forecast.
62nd-percentile task overlap — yet about 18,600 openings a year (+6.4% projected, BLS), and observed AI use leans 5423% copilot, not hand-off (AEI) . What exposure means →
What today's research says about this occupation's exposure to AI, how AI is actually being used in it, and where employment is headed. These are positions within published studies — measures of exposure and usage, not predictions that this job will disappear.
Each study uses its own scale, so the raw scores are not comparable across rows — the percentile (this job's rank among all U.S. occupations with data) is the comparable figure, and sizes the bars.
| Measure | Rank vs all occupations | Percentile | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall AI exposure (Felten et al.) High | 81st | 1.2 | |
| LLM task exposure, γ (OpenAI / Eloundou) Moderate | 56th | 0.7 | |
| AI assistant applicability (Microsoft) Moderate | 53rd | 0.2 |
OpenAI's exposure study scores tasks three ways: with a language model alone (α 0.1), with simple added tooling (β 0.4), and including AI-powered software (γ 0.7). Higher means more of the job's tasks could be done at least twice as fast — not that they will be automated away.
Most of this job's tasks can be done remotely (Dingel–Neiman), which tends to track with higher digital and AI exposure.
A pre-LLM (2013) estimate of how automatable this job is by computerization and robotics. Shown for historical context only — it is not part of any current AI ranking.
Frey–Osborne probability 0.0 · 5th percentile among occupations · Low
Among measured AI assistant conversations mapped to this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15), these task types came up most. These are shares of observed AI conversations — not shares of the job, of worker time, or of what could be automated.
| Prepare and maintain records and reports, such as budgets, personnel records, or training manuals. | 1.3% | |
| Research and analyze member or community needs to determine program directions and goals. | 0.7% |
Independent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projection for 2024–2034 — a labor-market forecast, not an AI-impact forecast.
| Outlook | About average · +6.4% by 2034 |
| Projected annual openings | 18,600 |
| Employment 2024 → 2034 | 219,800 → 233,900 |
“Annual openings” counts new jobs plus replacements for workers who leave the occupation, so it can be large even when growth is modest.
The ILO's 2025 global study scores generative-AI exposure on the international ISCO-08 occupation system, not US SOC. Bridged through the published (and approximate, many-to-many) IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 crosswalk, this US occupation corresponds to the international occupation below. Exposure here means how much of the work's tasks today's AI can attempt — task overlap, not automation, adoption, or jobs lost.
| International occupation (ISCO-08) | Task exposure (2025) | Most tasks fall in |
|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare Managers · 1344 | 37% | Minimal |
Read the whole six-band gradient on the GenAI exposure gradient page. The crosswalk is approximate: a US occupation can map to several international ones, and the ILO scores describe the international occupation, not this exact US role.
How people actually apply AI to this occupation's tasks, from Claude.ai (Free and Pro) conversations in the Anthropic Economic Index, 2026-01-15. This is one AI assistant's consumer sample — not all AI, not the whole workforce. Autonomy and the collaboration mix are model-rated estimates; figures below the sample floor are hidden.
| Augmentation vs. automation | 54.2% working with AI · 31.1% handed to AI |
| Most common way people use AI here | Iteration · you and AI go back and forth |
| Typical AI autonomy | 3.0 / 5 · higher = AI acts more independently |
| Used for work (vs. personal / coursework) | 83.5% |
The role's most common tasks in AI conversations, each tagged with how people work with the AI on it. “Usage” is the share of observed conversations, not of the job.
| Task | How | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Prepare and maintain records and reports, such as budgets, personnel records, or training manuals. | Iteration | 1.4% |
| Research and analyze member or community needs to determine program directions and goals. | Directive | 0.8% |
| Evaluate the work of staff and volunteers to ensure that programs are of appropriate quality and that resources are used effectively. | Iteration | 0.4% |
Tasks where the model most often judged that a person remained necessary — a useful read on the current boundary, not a guarantee.
| Prepare and maintain records and reports, such as budgets, personnel records, or training manuals. | 97.1% | |
| Evaluate the work of staff and volunteers to ensure that programs are of appropriate quality and that resources are used effectively. | 95.3% | |
| Research and analyze member or community needs to determine program directions and goals. | 94.9% |
Example prompts phrased from the tasks people most often delegate to AI in this occupation (Anthropic Economic Index). Each shows the underlying measured task and its share of observed AI use. They are suggested phrasings of real tasks — starting points, not endorsed instructions.
Help me prepare and maintain records and reports, such as budgets, personnel records, or training manuals. From: Prepare and maintain records and reports, such as budgets, personnel records, or training manuals. · 1.4% of measured AI use · task iteration
Help me research and analyze member or community needs to determine program directions and goals. From: Research and analyze member or community needs to determine program directions and goals. · 0.8% of measured AI use · directive
Help me evaluate the work of staff and volunteers to ensure that programs are of appropriate quality and that resources are used effectively. From: Evaluate the work of staff and volunteers to ensure that programs are of appropriate quality and that resources are used effectively. · 0.4% of measured AI use · task iteration
All 16 tasks O*NET lists for this occupation, ordered by importance. Each links to its own page with AI-exposure and observed-use detail.
O*NET importance rating, from 1 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
| Oral Expression | 4.4 | |
| Oral Comprehension | 4.1 | |
| Written Comprehension | 4.0 | |
| Problem Sensitivity | 4.0 | |
| Written Expression | 3.9 | |
| Deductive Reasoning | 3.9 | |
| Speech Recognition | 3.9 | |
| Speech Clarity | 3.9 | |
| Originality | 3.8 | |
| Inductive Reasoning | 3.8 | |
| Fluency of Ideas | 3.6 | |
| Information Ordering | 3.5 |
| Social Perceptiveness | 4.0 | |
| Service Orientation | 4.0 | |
| Coordination | 3.9 | |
| Complex Problem Solving | 3.9 | |
| Judgment and Decision Making | 3.9 | |
| Time Management | 3.9 | |
| Management of Personnel Resources | 3.9 | |
| Systems Analysis | 3.8 | |
| Systems Evaluation | 3.8 | |
| Instructing | 3.5 |
| Active Listening | 3.9 | |
| Critical Thinking | 3.9 | |
| Active Learning | 3.9 | |
| Monitoring | 3.9 | |
| Reading Comprehension | 3.8 | |
| Writing | 3.8 | |
| Speaking | 3.8 | |
| Learning Strategies | 3.6 |
Skills employers ask for in job postings for this occupation (Lightcast), with whether each is a common or specialized skill.
Showing the top 40 of 44.
How characteristic each condition is of the job, on O*NET's 1–5 context scale (higher = more present in day-to-day work). Each condition links to how it varies across all occupations.
What to study: Business, Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services , Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies , Public Administration and Social Service Professions . Fields of study crosswalked to this occupation (NCES CIP–SOC), not a requirement.
Share of people in this occupation at each level of education.
| Bachelor's Degree | 50.4% | |
| Master's Degree | 23.9% | |
| Associate's Degree (or other 2-year degree) | 8.2% | |
| Post-Master's Certificate | 8.1% | |
| High School Diploma | 7.2% | |
| Some College Courses | 2.2% |
The interests and personal qualities O*NET associates with people who do this work.
| Integrity | 10.0 | |
| Cooperation | 9.0 | |
| Achievement Orientation | 8.0 | |
| Social Orientation | 7.0 | |
| Self-Control | 6.0 | |
| Empathy | 5.0 | |
| Adaptability | 4.0 |
| Enterprising | 7.0 | |
| Social | 5.4 | |
| Conventional | 4.2 |
| Management/Administration | 6.4 | |
| Social Service | 6.1 | |
| Professional Advising | 5.0 | |
| Human Resources | 4.6 | |
| Public Speaking | 4.3 | |
| Personal Service | 3.6 |
U.S. · annual wages (BLS OEWS)
| 10th percentile | $50,020 |
| 25th percentile | $62,420 |
| Median (50th) | $78,240 |
| 75th percentile | $100,600 |
| 90th percentile | $129,820 |
| People employed | 195,490 |
Where these workers are employed, by number of jobs (national, BLS OEWS). Pay shown is the occupation's national median, not industry-specific.
| Industry | Workers | National median pay |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector | 122,240 | $74,980 |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector | 19,170 | $77,280 |
| Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities · National industry | 18,750 | $66,870 |
| Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · National industry | 7,460 | $62,790 |
| Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities · National industry | 6,890 | $75,490 |
| Educational Services · Sector | 6,430 | $88,040 |
| Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers · National industry | 5,930 | $80,020 |
| Management of Companies and Enterprises · Sector | 5,850 | $86,420 |
| Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians) · National industry | 1,470 | $89,120 |
| Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services · Sector | 1,360 | $101,850 |
| Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services · Sector | 1,000 | $81,070 |
| Real Estate and Rental and Leasing · Sector | 960 | $67,440 |
Industries where this occupation is far more common than in the economy as a whole. The location quotient is how many times more concentrated it is here (a value of 5 means five times its economy-wide share).
| Industry | Concentration | Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities · National industry | 21.01× | 6,890 |
| Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · National industry | 15.11× | 7,460 |
| Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers · National industry | 15.1× | 5,930 |
| Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities · National industry | 6.13× | 18,750 |
| Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians) · National industry | 4.79× | 1,470 |
| Health Care and Social Assistance · Sector | 4.17× | 122,240 |
| Other Services (except Public Administration) · Sector | 3.42× | 19,170 |
| Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities · National industry | 1.95× | 150 |
Part of the Healthcare & Human Services and Public Service & Safety career clusters.
Side-by-side comparisons place two occupations’ pay, preparation, skills, and AI exposure on the same page — same data, same scale, no forecast.
Options the data surfaces for Social and Community Service Managers — not advice or a forecast. Each is a real cross-link you can follow into the evidence.
Capabilities this work builds that are used across many other occupations.
Occupations O*NET rates as related — the nearby moves on the map.
How people typically prepare for this work.
On the global GenAI exposure gradient this work sits around the 69th percentile of 427 international occupations.
Social and Community Service Managers show 62nd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 18,600 annual U.S. openings
Social and Community Service Managers show 62nd-percentile AI task overlap — and about 18,600 annual U.S. openings • Social and Community Service Managers rank in the 62nd percentile (Moderate band) for AI task overlap across U.S. occupations — a measure of how much of the work today's AI can attempt, not how much is automated. (Eloundou et al. (GPTs are GPTs) + Felten AIOE) • The occupation is projected to see about 18,600 U.S. job openings per year (2024–34), counting growth and replacement — a labor-demand projection made independently of AI. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • BLS projects employment to be about average (+6.4%) from 2024 to 2034. (BLS Employment Projections 2024–34) • Median annual pay is $78,240, across about 195,490 U.S. workers. (BLS OEWS (May 2024)) • Of the AI use actually observed for this work, 54% looks like augmentation (drafting, iterating, checking) rather than hands-off automation — from a Claude.ai usage sample, not a census. (2026-01-15-v4-plus-2025-03-27-v2) Source: Singulariki — "Social and Community Service Managers". https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9151-00 Note: AI task overlap measures what today's AI can attempt, not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
AssetsShare imageMethodology & sourcesPress & newsroomThe newsroom
Every line is built only from figures this page already shows and cites. AI task overlap means what today's AI can attempt — not automation, job loss, or a forecast.
Every figure above traces to a named public dataset and the exact release below — not hand-written opinion. See the full methodology for what each measure does and does not mean.
Data compiled June 2, 2026. Figures are estimates, not advice.
Singulariki. "Social and Community Service Managers." Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Built from O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026. https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9151-00
Singulariki. (2026). Social and Community Service Managers. Singulariki: a source-backed encyclopedia of work. Retrieved June 7, 2026, from https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9151-00
@misc{singulariki-role-11-9151-00,
title = {Social and Community Service Managers},
author = {{Singulariki}},
year = {2026},
note = {O*NET 30.3; BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) May 2024; BLS Employment Projections 2024–2034; Anthropic Economic Index v4 (2026-01-15) + v2 (2025-03-27); Microsoft “Working with AI” working-with-ai; “GPTs are GPTs” (Eloundou et al.) arXiv 2303.10130; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE) Felten, Raj & Seamans; ILO / Gmyrek et al. GenAI exposure gradient 2025; IBS O*NET-SOC ↔ ISCO-08 occupation crosswalk 2022; Frey & Osborne (2013) frey-osborne-automation; Dingel & Neiman (2020) dingel-neiman-workathome. Accessed June 7, 2026},
url = {https://singulariki.com/roles/role-11-9151-00}
} Citations name the underlying public dataset releases — they reflect what this page is built from, not just the URL.